Natural Law in Action - Lawful Liberation Pt 22

The session examines the Bundy Ranch standoff as a framework for understanding natural law principles and jurisdictional authority, exploring how Cliven Bundy asserted ancestral land rights against federal authority. The discussion distinguishes between original organic jurisdiction and corporate administrative entities, explains stewardship versus ownership concepts for people, land, animals, and property, and details administrative remedies against government overreach. Particular emphasis is placed on proper language use to maintain jurisdictional standing, tactical approaches to rights restoration, documentation requirements for private property claims, and the philosophical underpinnings of natural law as contrasted with statutory systems.

1. Analysis of the 2014 Bundy Ranch standoff between Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and Bureau of Land Management officials over grazing rights, detailing how 200+ armed supporters faced federal agents who ultimately backed down.

2. Examination of Bundy's successful civil litigation against the federal government for damages related to the standoff.

3. Clarification of Bundy's self-identification as a "living man" asserting natural rights and constitutional principles rather than statutory definitions, with direct quotes rejecting federal jurisdiction including "I don't recognize the United States government as even existing" while acknowledging Nevada state laws.

4. Exploration of jurisdictional theory distinguishing between the "original geographical, political territory and its people" (the organic state) versus the "corporate administrative entity created later" (the legal fiction), explaining how natural law adherents claim connection to original organic jurisdiction.

5. Detailed explanation of land rights establishment through occupation and public declaration, including concepts like adverse possession, land patents, allodial title, and the process of reclaiming land currently controlled by corporate state entities through historical documentation and community support.

6. Discussion of international and community support resources for jurisdictional disputes, including international forums like the ICJ and UN Human Rights Committee alongside local assemblies, common law courts, and private membership associations, with emphasis on corruption resistance through decentralization.

7. Examination of the stewardship model in natural law as applied to children (living souls under divine stewardship), animals (divine creations requiring responsible care), land (ultimately belonging to the Creator), and personal property/chattels (fruits of human labor with fundamental rights attached).

8. Practical guidance for dealing with property seizures like vehicle towing, including proper documentation of private status, liability frameworks for pursuing accountability against individuals and entities, and administrative processes for remedy through notices, commercial claims, and assembly-based processes.

9. Assessment of relevant Supreme Court cases regarding property seizures including City of West Covina v. Perkins (1999), United States v. Good Real Property (1993), and Soldal v. Cook County (1992), with explanation of how these cases establish due process requirements.

10. Conceptual distinction between products of labor, chattel, ownership, and stewardship from natural law perspective, emphasizing careful language use like "private conveyance" instead of "vehicle" to maintain jurisdictional separation while communicating effectively.

11. Exploration of the theory that birth certificates create legal fictions separating the living soul from a statutory "person," comparing this to trust structures, securitization processes, and surety relationships.

12. Analysis of administrative approaches to restoring rights after felony convictions through jurisdictional arguments, tactical questioning strategies, tacit agreements, and assembly-based processes.